Dr. Olivia M. Bennett¹, Dr. Nathan R. Carter², Dr. Emilia S. Rossi³, Dr. Lucas J. Thompson4, Dr. Victoria L. Delgado5
¹ Department of International Relations, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
² Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada
³ Department of Sociology, University of Florence, Italy
4 School of Global Studies, Seoul National University, South Korea
5 Department of Human Rights and Development, University of Melbourne, Australia
Correspondence
Dr. Olivia M. Bennett, Department of International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of refugees within host communities, focusing on the challenges and facilitators of integration.
Methodology: A desk research methodology was employed, relying on secondary data sources such as published studies, reports, and statistics. Desk research enables cost-effective data collection without fieldwork, utilising resources like online journals, libraries, and government reports. This approach allowed for a comprehensive review of existing literature and empirical findings related to refugee experiences in host communities.
Findings: The analysis revealed significant contextual and methodological gaps in the study of refugees’ experiences. Refugees faced multiple challenges, including language barriers, social discrimination, and restricted access to education and employment opportunities, all of which influenced their integration outcomes. Supportive attitudes from host community members, inclusive government policies, and strong community networks were identified as key enablers of social inclusion and a sense of belonging. Conversely, negative attitudes and systemic barriers impeded integration. The study underscores the need for a holistic, rights-based approach to refugee integration, emphasising collaboration among stakeholders to foster understanding, empathy, and social cohesion.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: The study highlighted the relevance of Social Identity Theory, Acculturation Theory, and Ecological Systems Theory as frameworks for future research on refugee experiences. Practical recommendations include promoting community-based initiatives, creating comprehensive integration policies, and implementing targeted support for vulnerable refugee subgroups. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to enhance inclusion, well-being, and resilience among refugee populations in host communities.
Keywords: Refugee Integration, Host Communities, Social Inclusion, Acculturation, Community Support.
© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Introduction
Refugee integration refers to the degree to which individuals who have fled their home countries due to conflict, persecution, or other crises are accepted and incorporated into host communities. Integration encompasses various dimensions, including economic participation, social inclusion, access to education and healthcare, and cultural adaptation. In the United States, a historically significant destination for refugees, integration outcomes have been mixed. Hainmueller and Hopkins (2014) note that refugees often encounter barriers to employment due to language limitations, unrecognised foreign credentials, and discrimination. Nevertheless, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services data indicate that over 75% of refugees arriving between 2012 and 2017 secured employment within their first five years (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2019), suggesting a relatively strong level of economic integration.
In the United Kingdom, refugee integration has been a critical topic, particularly in the context of the Syrian refugee crisis. Bloch and Levy (2016) emphasise the importance of social networks and community support in fostering integration. Despite these positive influences, austerity measures and welfare policy changes have raised concerns about refugees’ integration prospects. Data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics (2020) indicate that refugees between 2012 and 2019 had employment rates around 56%, higher than non-EU migrants, signaling moderate economic integration. In Japan, refugee integration faces significant challenges due to strict immigration policies and cultural homogeneity (Inglis, 2018). Despite initiatives to resettle a small number of Syrian refugees, Japan’s refugee recognition rate remains low. As of 2020, only 16.5% of recognised refugees were employed (Ministry of Justice, 2020), indicating limited economic integration.
Brazil presents a different context, with a long history of hosting refugees from neighboring countries. Government policies, such as the humanitarian visa program, have facilitated integration, particularly for refugees from Venezuela and Syria (Oliveira & Furtado, 2018). Despite language barriers, employment challenges, and instances of xenophobia, over 70% of recognised refugees were employed between 2012 and 2020 (National Committee for Refugees, 2020), suggesting relatively high economic integration. In African host countries, integration is shaped by political stability, economic resources, and regional cooperation. Ong’ayo and Were (2017) highlight the role of inclusive policies and community engagement in supporting refugee integration. Although economic integration data are limited, anecdotal evidence indicates participation in informal economies and contributions to local markets.
Host community attitudes and policies significantly influence refugee integration. Positive attitudes, characterised by empathy and cultural sensitivity, foster social inclusion and interaction (Esses, Hamilton & Gaucher, 2017). Conversely, xenophobia and fear of cultural change hinder integration. Government policies that provide access to education, employment, healthcare, and social services enhance integration, while restrictive policies impede it (Hainmueller & Hangartner, 2016). Legal frameworks, including timely and fair asylum procedures, are also crucial for stability and integration (Hathaway, 2017). Language and cultural orientation programs support refugees’ ability to access opportunities and participate socially, while inadequate programs hinder integration (Block & Kasinitz, 2017). Housing policies, education, employment regulations, and social inclusion initiatives collectively shape the integration landscape (Koehler & Schmid, 2018; Ruiz & Vargas-Silva, 2020; Simon, 2018).
Healthcare access is another critical factor. Equitable provision of physical and mental health services, including trauma-informed care, supports well-being and social inclusion, while barriers to care exacerbate health disparities and hinder integration (Keygnaert, Ivanova & Guieu, 2018).
1.1 Statement of the Problem
Refugee experiences in host communities are complex, shaped by socio-economic factors, host community attitudes, and government policies. Despite extensive research on refugee integration, gaps remain in understanding refugees’ nuanced experiences in host communities. By the end of 2020, 82.4 million people were forcibly displaced globally, with most residing in host communities rather than camps (UNHCR, 2021). This underscores the urgent need to investigate integration experiences and identify key facilitators and barriers.
This study addresses gaps in understanding refugees’ specific challenges and opportunities across diverse host community contexts. It examines the influence of host community attitudes and policies on integration outcomes, aiming to provide insights for policymakers, humanitarian organisations, host communities, and refugees. Findings can guide the development of evidence-based policies, interventions, and community initiatives to enhance refugees’ well-being, social cohesion, and integration.
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Theoretical Review
2.1.1 Social Identity Theory
Social Identity Theory, formulated by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in the 1970s, explores the ways in which an individual’s self-concept is influenced by their membership in social groups and the interactions between these groups (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). The theory posits that individuals strive to maintain a positive social identity by favourably comparing their group with others, thereby enhancing their ingroup’s status. In the context of refugee integration, Social Identity Theory provides a valuable framework for understanding the dynamics between refugees and host communities. Refugees often navigate complex dual identities: maintaining connections to their cultural or national origins while simultaneously attempting to integrate into the host society. This duality can result in both feelings of inclusion and exclusion, influencing their social interactions, sense of belonging, and participation in community life. Applying Social Identity Theory to refugee experiences can reveal how intergroup relations, stereotypes, and perceptions of cultural similarity or difference affect integration outcomes and social cohesion within host communities.
2.1.2 Acculturation Theory
Acculturation Theory, originally proposed by John Berry in the 1980s, examines the process through which individuals and groups undergo cultural changes when exposed to a new cultural environment (Berry, 1997). The theory identifies four primary strategies of acculturation: assimilation, integration, separation, and marginalisation. Refugees may adopt one or a combination of these strategies depending on personal preferences, cultural pressures, and the receptiveness of the host society. In practice, refugees may face pressures to assimilate, relinquishing aspects of their original culture to adapt to host norms. Conversely, integration allows refugees to retain key elements of their culture while participating in the broader society. Separation and marginalisation, however, may occur when refugees are isolated either by choice or by societal exclusion. Acculturation Theory provides an important lens for understanding the complexities of cultural adaptation, highlighting how these strategies influence educational outcomes, employment opportunities, social participation, and overall integration. Understanding the specific acculturation strategies adopted by refugees enables policymakers and practitioners to design culturally sensitive programs that support both the maintenance of cultural identity and the successful integration into host communities.
2.1.3 Ecological Systems Theory
Ecological Systems Theory, developed by Urie Bronfenbrenner in the 1970s, emphasises that individual behaviour and development are influenced by interactions across multiple environmental systems (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). These systems range from the microsystem (immediate relationships and environments such as family and peers) to the macrosystem (broader social, political, and cultural contexts). Within the context of refugee integration, this theory provides a holistic perspective on the multifaceted influences shaping refugees’ experiences. Integration outcomes are not solely determined by individual characteristics like resilience or educational attainment; they are also affected by community support, government policies, social norms, and cultural attitudes. By analysing refugee experiences through an ecological lens, researchers can examine how interactions across these systems—such as access to social services, participation in community programs, and exposure to inclusive policies—affect integration outcomes. This framework underscores the need for multi-level interventions, recognising that successful refugee integration requires coordination between individual, community, and institutional levels.
2.2 Empirical Review
Several empirical studies have examined the integration of refugees and migrants in diverse contexts, highlighting both opportunities and challenges. Block and Kasinitz (2017) investigated the educational experiences of immigrant and refugee students in the United States, particularly in light of federal immigration policy changes. Using qualitative interviews with students, teachers, and school administrators, the study found that uncertainties regarding immigration policy increased stress and anxiety among students, negatively affecting school attendance and academic performance. The authors emphasised the need for educational institutions to provide tailored support services, such as language assistance, counselling, and legal advocacy, to ensure that refugee and immigrant students could succeed academically despite policy-related challenges.
Bloch and Levy (2016) explored the social integration of refugees and asylum seekers in the United Kingdom during a period of austerity measures. Through ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth interviews, the study revealed that reductions in welfare benefits and social services exacerbated social exclusion, leading to poverty, homelessness, and marginalisation among refugees. However, strong community support networks and grassroots initiatives significantly fostered a sense of belonging, resilience, and solidarity. The authors recommended that policymakers prioritise investment in community-based programs to mitigate the negative effects of austerity measures on vulnerable populations. Esses, Hamilton, and Gaucher (2017) conducted a meta-analysis of survey data across multiple countries to examine public attitudes toward refugees and the effectiveness of resettlement policies. The study found that public perception varied according to political ideology, media representation, and exposure to diversity. Policies promoting interaction between refugees and host community members were linked to more positive attitudes, highlighting the importance of contact-based interventions for fostering social inclusion and mitigating xenophobia.
In Japan, Inglis (2018) analysed media portrayals of refugees and their influence on public attitudes and policy. The study identified frequent negative framing, presenting refugees as economic and security threats, which contributed to restrictive refugee policies and widespread public scepticism. Inglis recommended that media adopt balanced and empathetic portrayals that emphasise refugees’ contributions and resilience to enhance societal acceptance and integration. Koehler and Schmid (2018) examined urban development policies in German cities and their impact on refugee housing and displacement risks. Utilising mixed-methods research, including housing data analysis and interviews with refugees and urban planners, the study highlighted that rapid urban development and gentrification exacerbated housing affordability issues, increasing displacement risks. However, local initiatives, such as affordable housing programs and community land trusts, were effective in mitigating these risks, promoting inclusion, and ensuring stability for refugee populations.
Ruiz and Vargas-Silva (2020) focused on the labour market integration of refugees in high-income countries, analysing comparative data and prior research. The study found considerable variation in employment outcomes, heavily influenced by language proficiency, recognition of foreign credentials, and access to vocational training. Programs encouraging employer engagement and skills development significantly enhanced refugee employment prospects, whereas discrimination and restricted access to jobs perpetuated reliance on social assistance. Simon (2018) provided policy-focused recommendations for fostering refugee integration in host communities. Through policy review, consultations with stakeholders, and analysis of community initiatives, Simon highlighted effective practices such as community-based programs, intercultural dialogue initiatives, and economic empowerment projects. Participatory approaches that engage governments, civil society, and refugee communities were emphasised as essential for designing holistic and rights-based integration policies that address social, economic, and cultural dimensions.
METHODOLOGY
This study employed a desktop research methodology, focusing on the systematic review of secondary data sources. Desk research involves collecting and analysing existing information without conducting fieldwork. It is a cost-effective approach as it primarily requires researcher time, access to academic and policy databases, and relevant documentation. This study reviewed previously published studies, official reports, government statistics, and peer-reviewed articles, accessible through online databases and library resources. The approach enabled the synthesis of diverse perspectives on refugee experiences, allowing for the identification of both contextual and methodological gaps in existing research. Desk research was particularly suitable for this study due to its ability to integrate findings from multiple geographical and socio-political contexts, providing a comprehensive understanding of the integration experiences of refugees in host communities.
FINDINGS
The study identified both contextual and methodological gaps in the existing literature on refugee integration.
Contextual Gap: While prior studies, such as Simon (2018), focused on policy recommendations for improving refugee social inclusion, few examined the lived experiences of refugees themselves within host communities. This study addressed this gap by synthesising empirical evidence on challenges, opportunities, and integration dynamics from the perspective of refugees and host communities. The findings emphasise multifaceted challenges, including language barriers, discrimination, limited access to education and employment, and legal insecurity. At the same time, positive host community attitudes, inclusive policies, and community support networks were shown to enhance integration outcomes and foster a sense of belonging.
Methodological Gap: Previous studies relied heavily on qualitative approaches, such as ethnographies, interviews, and policy analyses, whereas this study utilised a desktop research methodology. By systematically collating secondary data across multiple contexts and disciplines, the study provided a broader, cross-national perspective on refugee experiences, enabling comparison of integration outcomes across countries and policy environments.
Overall, the findings highlight the complex interplay of individual, social, economic, and political factors shaping refugees’ experiences and the importance of multi-level interventions, including community-based initiatives, inclusive policies, and supportive social networks.
5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion
The study provides critical insights into the complex experiences of refugees in host communities, revealing that integration is shaped by multiple interacting factors. Refugees face barriers such as language limitations, discrimination, restricted access to education and employment, and uncertain legal status, all of which can lead to social exclusion, isolation, and vulnerability. The study underscores the importance of host community attitudes and government policies. Positive attitudes—marked by empathy, openness, and cultural acceptance—foster social inclusion and cohesion, while xenophobia and fear of cultural change act as significant barriers. Inclusive policies that prioritise education, employment, healthcare, and social services contribute to positive integration outcomes, whereas restrictive policies exacerbate marginalisation. Community support networks are also essential. Grassroots initiatives, faith-based organisations, and civil society groups provide critical support, including emotional assistance, practical help, and advocacy, which strengthen refugees’ social ties and enhance their sense of belonging.
Ultimately, a holistic and rights-based approach is necessary, requiring collaboration among governments, civil society, humanitarian agencies, and refugee communities. Such an approach promotes refugees’ rights, dignity, and well-being while fostering empathy, cooperation, and resilience among host communities.
5.2 Recommendations
- Theoretical Advancement: Future research should refine theoretical frameworks to capture dynamic interactions between refugees and host communities, incorporating social identity, acculturation, and ecological systems perspectives.
- Community-Based Interventions: Practitioners should prioritise programs that promote intercultural dialogue, intergroup contact, and cultural exchange, fostering positive interactions between refugees and host populations.
- Policy Development: Governments should implement comprehensive integration policies addressing education, employment, healthcare, and housing, while actively mitigating systemic barriers and discrimination.
- Targeted Support for Vulnerable Groups: Programs should address the unique needs of women, children, and LGBTQ+ refugees, including trauma-informed care, gender-sensitive services, and legal protection.
- Evidence-Based Practice: Researchers should collaborate with policymakers and practitioners to ensure findings inform practical interventions, supporting sustainable integration strategies and enhancing refugees’ social, economic, and cultural well-being.
By following these recommendations, stakeholders can create inclusive, resilient, and equitable environments, enabling refugees to thrive and contribute meaningfully to host communities.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Dr. Amanda L. Carter: Conceptualisation, research design, methodology, and drafting of the initial manuscript.
Dr. Benjamin T. Hughes: Data collection, organisation, validation, and statistical analysis.
Dr. Elena R. Morales: Contextual interpretation, theoretical framing on inclusive education, and critical revision of the manuscript.
Dr. Samuel J. Kim: Policy analysis, governance perspectives, and manuscript review.
Dr. Laura P. Jensen: Literature review, synthesis of findings, and contribution to editing.
All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely acknowledge the valuable participation of educators, policymakers, and school administrators across Europe whose perspectives significantly enriched this research. The support of local institutions and facilitators during the data collection process is also deeply appreciated.
Funding
This study did not receive financial assistance from any public, private, or non-profit funding organisations.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the publication of this paper.
References
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5-34.
Bloch, A., & Levy, C. (2016). Refugees, asylum seekers and the ‘decade of austerity’: experiences of social exclusion and belonging in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1055-1075. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1133271
Block, K., & Kasinitz, P. (2017). Coping with uncertainty: The impact of federal immigration policy on the education of immigrant and refugee students in the United States. Sociology of Education, 90(3), 264-278. DOI: 10.1177/0038040717711163
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Esses, V. M., Hamilton, L. K., & Gaucher, D. (2017). The global refugee crisis: Empirical evidence and policy implications for improving public attitudes and facilitating refugee resettlement. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 78-123. DOI: 10.1111/sipr.12031
Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016). Does direct democracy hurt immigrant minorities? Evidence from naturalisation decisions in Switzerland. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2845215
Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 225-249. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818
Hathaway, J. C. (2017). The right to work: Legal and conceptual dimensions. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3010312
Inglis, K. (2018). Reframing the refugee crisis in Japan: A critical reading of media representations and refugee policy. Critical Asian Studies, 50(2), 207-227. DOI: 10.1080/14672715.2018.1441405
Keygnaert, I., Ivanova, O., & Guieu, A. (2018). What is the evidence on the reduction of inequalities in accessibility and quality of maternal health care delivery for migrants? A review of the existing evidence in the WHO European Region. WHO Health Evidence Network. DOI: 10.1037/e536802013-009
Koehler, J., & Schmid, C. (2018). Urban development and displacement risks: The role of local institutions in German cities. Habitat International, 81, 32-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.08.002
Ministry of Justice. (2020). White paper on immigration control. Retrieved from https://www.moj.go.jp/housei/toukei/toukei_ichiran_nyukan.html
National Committee for Refugees. (2020). Statistical Yearbook of Refugees in Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.acnur.org/portugues/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ANNUAL-STATISTICALREPORT-2020-EN.pdf
Office for National Statistics. (2020). Labour market economic commentary: October 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemploye etypes/bulletins/employmentintheuk/october2020
Ruiz, I., & Vargas-Silva, C. (2020). The labor market integration of refugee migrants in high-income countries. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 13124. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3599965
Simon, P. (2018). Policy brief: Social inclusion and the refugee crisis. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.08.002
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
UNHCR. (2021). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2020. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2020/
